The Supreme Court on Monday firmly rejected any relaxation of the stringent Graded Response Action Plan (GRAP)-IV measures aimed at combating Delhi's hazardous air pollution.
A bench comprising Justices Abhay S Oka and AG Masih declared that the court would only consider easing restrictions after observing a consistent downward trend in air quality levels. The next hearing on this matter is scheduled for Thursday, providing an opportunity for parties to present their arguments regarding modifications to GRAP-IV's implementation.
Adding another layer of urgency, the court expressed its disappointment with the lack of compliance from neighboring states – Delhi, Rajasthan, Haryana, and Uttar Pradesh – in fulfilling its directive to compensate construction workers affected by pollution control measures. The Chief Secretaries of these states have been summoned to appear virtually at the next hearing to explain their failure.
"When we summon top officials, then only does the ball start rolling," remarked the court, highlighting the importance of accountability and decisive action in tackling this pressing issue.
The Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati presented data on Air Quality Index (AQI) levels and suggestions for relaxing GRAP-IV restrictions. However, the bench remained unconvinced, emphasizing that the current AQI is not stable enough to warrant any easing of measures.
To ensure effective implementation of mitigation strategies, the court directed the Central Air Quality Management Commission (CAQM) to actively communicate with relevant authorities and coordinate efforts across various agencies. It also took note of alarming reports from court commissioners who shed light on a concerning lack of coordination between the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD), Delhi Police, Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC), and other responsible entities.
The court stressed that it is the commission's responsibility to effectively coordinate these activities and ensure the successful implementation of pollution control measures.
Furthermore, recognizing the potential risks faced by court commissioners while performing their duties, the court directed the Delhi Police to provide adequate protection for them. One commissioner revealed to the court instances of intimidation and shared concerns about health issues stemming from air pollution.
Adding to the gravity of the situation, a counsel informed the court about areas that have become "no man's land," with trucks transporting heavy materials like wood and cement, while state officials denied jurisdiction over these zones. Amicus Curiae Aparajita Singh urged the court to establish a security group for the protection of commissioners, highlighting their vulnerability.
The Supreme Court has been actively engaged in addressing the issue of air pollution in Delhi, previously commending the work of the 13 appointed commissioners. Their appointments have been extended, requiring them to continue their visits to various entry points, playing a crucial role in monitoring and implementing pollution control measures.
